University Money, Dirty Hands? Tracing Campus Endowment Ties to Global Gambling Giants

• Share on
• 
• 
• 
• 

How can a university preach responsibility by day and profit from addiction by night? That’s the question students in Australia asked when it was revealed the University of Sydney had invested millions in gambling companies. The expose sparked backlash not just because of the investments, but because of how little was known about them. Now, students across the U.S. are beginning to ask whether their own universities may be doing the same—with billion-dollar endowments often hidden behind vague financial labels.

From Lecture Halls to Roulette Tables: How University Funds Flow into Gambling

University endowments in the U.S. reached over $839 billion in 2024. Most are managed through external firms that use large-scale investment products. These often include sectors like tech, real estate, healthcare—and online gambling.

Many universities invest through mutual funds or ETFs. These products group together dozens or even hundreds of companies. As a result, boards and administrators rarely review each individual asset. In some cases, students have identified indirect connections to gambling companies through public investment records.

One institution’s portfolio included a fund that tracks the performance of digital gaming sectors. The fund didn’t list gambling specifically, and the university made no mention of it in public reports. That lack of detail raises questions about whether schools are ignoring what’s in their holdings—or simply don’t know.

Ethical Dissonance: When Education and Gambling Collide

Most universities promote mental health awareness and financial responsibility. At the same time, few have policies that prevent their investments from including gambling-related companies. Campus codes often warn students about gambling, yet part of the school’s income may come from it.

According to the National Council on Problem Gambling, people aged 18 to 24 are among the most likely to develop harmful gambling patterns. This overlaps directly with the student population. Gavin Harper, a researcher at truebluecasinos.org, says, “Online casinos use short attention cycles and rapid feedback systems. These are designed to trigger habitual use, especially in younger users. If institutions support these systems financially, they should be aware of what that means”.

Food for Thought: Are Students Subsidizing Casino Profits While Skipping Meals?

In 2024, data from The Hope Center showed that 38% of college students reported food insecurity. At the same time, some universities saw steady endowment growth through sectors labeled “digital entertainment” or “consumer engagement”. These categories can include gambling-linked businesses.

On some campuses, food pantries are serving more students each semester. Meanwhile, investment portfolios may benefit from business models that rely on frequent digital spending. Students dealing with basic needs shortages have begun asking whether university funds reflect the day-to-day reality of the people they’re meant to serve. When questions arise, detailed investment data is often difficult to obtain.

Student Power and Transparency: Who’s Asking the Hard Questions?

Students at several universities have launched campaigns demanding transparency around where institutional funds are held. Some have used Freedom of Information laws to access breakdowns of endowment assets. These efforts have uncovered indirect ties to industries students view as unethical—including gambling.

More students are using tools like public fund databases and shareholder tracking platforms to make sense of financial disclosures. These tools help decode labels like “consumer services” or “online casinos”, which can hide specific business activities. While previous campaigns focused on fossil fuels and weapons, gambling is now entering conversations about ethical investment. Activists are connecting financial decisions to student welfare and institutional accountability.

Conclusion

What universities choose to fund reflects more than just market strategy—it reflects priorities. While students juggle tuition, rent, and even basic meals, institutional wealth may be quietly tied to industries they’re warned to avoid. Gambling isn’t just an ethical issue; it’s a mirror held up to a system built on contradictions. As students demand clarity, the era of silent profits may be running out of time.